Carriers Need to Wake up and Smell the FMC Money
By DiVitas Chief Blogger
A few weeks ago I was surfing the Web and came across an amazingly bizarre article about how a Sprint customer passed away right around Christmas. This guy’s Sprint phone was bought at a subsidized price, and thus came with the typical two-year service contract, which Sprint insisted was still current and refused to terminate.
Given the man’s unexpected death came a just few days before Christmas, you can imagine how devastated his family must have been over his sudden death (he had adult children handling the debacle with Sprint).
Now imagine how his family reacted to the response from Sprint: sorry dude, a contract is a contract and you can’t get out of it, even if you’ve permanently stop breathing.
Reading about this family’s struggle with Sprint over the staggeringly petty issue of canceling a single consumer’s contract really struck home to me – The carriers just don’t get it. Instead of embracing the mobile-convergence market, the carriers are actually ignoring a huge opportunity in this fast-growing space. They are showing how rigid they are by sticking their heads in the sand, ignoring not only customer service but the opportunity to grow with this emerging market.
Carriers today view mobile-convergence as a threat, as something that will cause their customers to spend less money on cell minutes. What they fail to realize is that while the consumer segment is near saturation, the pool of potential business-cell minutes are practically untouched.
Even if a mobile-convergence user replaces some cell minutes with free WiFi minutes, carriers also – really – need to realize there is a large emerging business opportunity. An enterprise will buy data plans for its mobile workers once it adopts a mobile Unified Communications solution that includes a Fixed Mobile Convergence (FMC) component;a data plan is required for email, Instant Messaging and Presence.
Cha-ching! See? Mobile-convergence users will actually spend more money on carrier services in the long run.
Ironically, for all of the fuss, there’s really no great sacrifice or effort for carriers when it comes to getting behind the mobile-convergence movement. It basically means they need to encourage handset manufacturers to offer a wider variety of dual-mode handsets models. And they need to encourage manufacturers to innovate in technology areas such as improving battery life and WiFi performance, on devices that have been built so far.
It also means unlocking phones so that they are not tied to your proprietary cellular network.
On this matter, it seems that Verizon is one carrier that started to see the light. In November, the company announced this year it would open its network to “any apps, any device.” I say bully for you!
According to The New York Times, which printed an article on the Verizon announcement, “…Verizon will offer two flavors of service: its traditional bundle, which typically includes a subsidy for phone purchase and various other features, and a “bring your own” device service, which will be open to any device that meets “minimum technical standards.”
Verizon has not yet 100 percent crystallized details of these plans for public consumption, and there may be a downside for using a non-Verizon certified phone. Nonetheless, it’s a step that should help spur a very positive trend among carriers. If this is the beginning of a trend, this is good news for companies like DiVitas and, moreover, our users. This is because we should see more innovation in the area of dual-mode handsets.
And under this unlocked scenario, a family of Verizon users wouldn’t necessarily get stuck paying for a 2-year contract in the event of sudden personal catastrophe.
Frankly speaking, carries should just stop haggling for one minute over a few measly bucks, and instead put their energy into the mobile-convergence movement for business. They just might find themselves with some great money-making opportunities.
I think it’s called keeping “your eye on the enterprise prize.”